How Politicians are Failing to Address the Real Problems in Healthcare

Americans witnessed the many failed attempts of our elected officials to reform our broken healthcare system over the past year. Some call for repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) while others think it is the cure-all for what ails our system. The simple fact that politicians fail to consider is the fact that having healthcare coverage does equate to actually receiving healthcare services.

In fact, the US is the only country in the world where its citizens file bankruptcy due to medical costs. This is despite the fact that the majority of these patients were covered by healthcare insurance for the entire year these expenses were incurred. I challenge politicians to step outside their little worlds and answer that question. How can patients go bankrupt while being “covered” by medical insurance? Perhaps, when that question is considered, the fundamental problems of the system can then be examined. Until then, our system will continue to exclude certain patients from receiving medical services and the disparities in healthcare will be an uncrossable gulf.

I further challenge our elected legislators to address why healthcare is so expensive.  If coverage is mandated while prices continue to soar, we will bankrupt the nation. Mandated care is NOT the solution. At least try to understand the costs before you toss out unworkable solutions. Too much of taxpayer money has been wasted by those pandering solutions without investing any thought process into it. How many of those voting on recent bills actually read the pages and pages of legally worded trivia? I challenge politicians to actually read  the, shall we say garbage, that key politicians are advocating?

Ever wonder why a medication costs so much at the pharmacy? Pharmaceutical companies create medications that are patented and no one else can manufacture the same medication for a number of years. Basically, those companies hold monopolies over their highest costing products. They can charge whatever they want. They claim those costs go into research and development. However, look at the profits of those companies and the salaries of their executives. Also, the fact is that those companies spend more on advertising than research and development. Yet, there is little oversight into their business practices. As key players in our nation’s economy, politicians fear angering them and losing their political support.

Third party insurance companies also operate with little oversight. The top executives of the biggest companies earn tens of millions of dollars annually. Yet, a patient cannot get the medications they need because the insurance company will not pay for it. Also, a patient may be suffering and cannot be diagnosed because the insurance company will not pay for a test that is needed in order to know what is wrong. Does anyone else see a clear conflict of interest in the fact that those denying medical services are the same ones that profit when those healthcare costs are denied? Again, politicians don’t want to lose the support of these powerhouses of the US economy. Yet, they mandate, at the point of being threatening with tax fines, to do business (buy premiums) from these same companies that deny them needed services.

Everyone knows a hospital visit can cost more than buying a new home, or a college education for a classroom of teens. Hospitals are allowed to charge facility fees on top of their customary fees. In essence, they end up getting paid twice for the same services. Executives at hospitals may not earn as much as the companies but did you ever notice how many of them  are? If there is a department, there are several executives. If there is a project, there are several managers. There is a well-known graph that shows the rise in healthcare costs directly corresponds to the number of executives. These executives do not treat patients of directly benefit patients in any way. Their main job function is to maximize profits for their hospitals.

If politicians really want to address the problems in healthcare and fix our broken system, they will never succeed until they step out their comfort zone and actually think, using their own neurons, about the regulations they are proposing and/or voting on. They will fail unless they worry less about big company support and actually care about their fellow human beings. My question is, are any of them actually capable of this? Or we all just stand by while our healthcare system implodes and people die for the sake of political corruption.

Digiprove sealCopyright secured by Digiprove © 2018 Linda Girgis, MD, FAAFP

Related Posts

4 thoughts on “How Politicians are Failing to Address the Real Problems in Healthcare

  1. Problems of access, cost, and quality have been ping ponged since the Nixon years. It is not that elected officials do not want to fix this as many proposals have emerged. Too often, though, the quest for the perfect becomes the enemy of the good. At work, they just made me do a video module on continuous improvement. As much as I would like to hit the reset button and start over on a lot of things, it makes more sense to pick one or two glaring deficiencies and solve them so that what we have improves on what we used to have, allowing the complaints to move to the next improvement. This is not very different from medical thinking. If somebody comes to the office with five things to do and you try to fix all five, you will likely fix none. If you fix two and put three for later in the year, you will have fixed two.

  2. Linda,

    Politicians, CEOs of health insurance companies & pharmaceutical companies can implement radical changes to rectify the impending crisis.
    Needed is the political will.
    There is little obligation/onus/legislation compelling them to do so.
    Loopholes are constantly created.
    The three have one another’s back and the cycle continuous.

    And, the tax paying and health premium paying public is left out in the cold. Having no say? Why is that?

    “… having healthcare coverage does equate to actually receiving healthcare services…” How is this even possible?

    Start with:
    1. Accountability measures applied top to bottom.
    2. Ethical business practices enforced.
    3. Ethical medicine practiced. It’s not only for first year med students.
    4. Get MDs to speak up. (Problem can be kickback to MDs?)

    What’s the Surgeon General’s role in all of this? Only symbolic?

    Accountability is a good place to start.

    Thanks for the post, Linda!

Please add your voice to the discussion